🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.